SecureWorld News

Collaboration Catastrophe: Teams Flaws Expose the Crisis of Trust

Written by Cam Sivesind | Wed | Nov 12, 2025 | 2:37 PM Z

Microsoft Teams has become the central nervous system for modern corporate communication. It's where business decisions are made, secrets are shared, and workflows are executed. Its ubiquity is its strength—and, as recent findings from Check Point Research (CPR) reveal, a critical vulnerability.

CPR's in-depth examination of the platform uncovered multiple critical flaws that allowed attackers to completely undermine the security foundations of digital collaboration, targeting both external users and internal employees. For CISOs, this research is a powerful reminder that platforms built on assumed internal trust are becoming the softest target in the enterprise stack.

The Check Point research, detailed in the company's blog post, "Exploiting Trust in Collaboration: Microsoft Teams Vulnerabilities Uncovered," centered on two primary domains of compromise.

1. Manipulating conversations and notifications

The research identified flaws that allowed attackers to directly manipulate conversation content and exploit notification mechanisms. This is devastating because it enables seamless social engineering. An attacker doesn't need to spoof an email; they can alter a message that has already been sent or force a notification that appears to originate from a trusted internal source.

This capability to exploit notifications creates a new level of urgency and deception, compelling users to click malicious links or perform actions based on manipulated in-app alerts.

2. The malicious insiders and external guests

The flaws were shown to be exploitable by two critical threat actors:

  • External guests: The research proved that even users granted limited external access (guests) could potentially leverage certain flaws to access or impact information beyond their intended scope. This is a common architectural blind spot, where guest access controls are often less stringent than core employee policies.

  • Malicious insiders: For the malicious insider, the vulnerabilities were a powerful tool for impersonating colleagues. An attacker who gains a foothold internally—or an employee with bad intent—could leverage the flaws to spoof the identity of a senior executive or IT administrator. This impersonation is extremely difficult to detect because the malicious activity originates from within the trusted application interface itself.

The ability to impersonate colleagues and manipulate conversations fundamentally breaks the trust model of the platform, turning a collaborative space into a high-fidelity staging ground for fraud and data theft.

Why collaboration flaws are a strategic threat

This is not a traditional vulnerability where a patch fixes a static bug. This is a weakness in the logic of trust that underpins these applications.

  1. High-trust context: Teams is intrinsically viewed as a high-trust environment. Employees are conditioned to instantly trust messages from colleagues shown in the familiar interface, lowering their guard against social engineering compared to external email.

  2. Shadow IT risk: As Teams integrates more deeply with third-party apps, any flaw can cascade into a supply chain attack. If an attacker gains control through a Teams vulnerability, they can pivot into linked applications (like file shares, Jira, or service management tools) where the real high-value data resides.

  3. Data leakage potential: Manipulation and impersonation are often precursors to data exfiltration. An attacker impersonating a manager can trick a subordinate into sharing sensitive financial or intellectual property data directly through the "secure" chat environment.

The findings from Check Point Research require an urgent strategic pivot for any CISO whose organization relies on Microsoft Teams.

  • Review guest access: Immediately review and enforce the principle of least privilege for all external guests. Treat guest accounts as high-risk, non-trusted entities, and ensure all associated policies are continuously audited.

  • Behavioral monitoring: Relying on simple authentication is insufficient. Security Operations Centers (SOCs) must integrate User and Entity Behavior Analytics (UEBA) specifically for collaboration platforms. Look for anomalous activity, such as unusual message volumes from a known user, rapid changes in permissions, or access to sensitive channels outside of normal business hours.

  • Patching and vetting: While Microsoft has addressed the reported vulnerabilities, the existence of these flaws underscores the need for continuous vigilance. Ensure all endpoints are running the latest versions of the Teams client, and—crucially—strictly vet any third-party application integration within the Teams ecosystem. If an app doesn't need conversation read access, revoke it.

The modern attack surface is the digital water cooler. CISOs must now adopt a Zero Trust philosophy for collaboration, assuming every message, attachment, and notification is potentially malicious until proven otherwise.